Top 10 Men of 2026: Who Has Scored the Most Fantasy Points, and Who Gives You the Most per Credit

Fifteen tournaments. That's where the 2026 Premier Padel season stands as we write this, and it's enough of a sample to stop guessing and start counting. So we did: every fantasy point scored by every male player in OutOfTheCourt since January, added up and weighed against what those players cost you today. Two rankings come out of it. One rewards sheer production. The other rewards production per credit, and that's where the real story is.

📐 How we ranked them

The first ranking is simple: total fantasy points collected in 2026 across every Premier Padel tournament played so far, with the number of tournaments and the per-tournament average alongside for context. The second divides those total points by the player's current price in credits, giving you FP per credit, a measure of how much production each credit you spend has actually bought this season. Both lists include every player with at least one 2026 tournament. Costs are the live values in the app right now, so they already reflect the latest recalculation.

🏆 Top 10 by Total Fantasy Points

No surprises at the very top, but the order is worth a second look. Federico Chingotto leads the entire circuit with 1,565.3 fantasy points, and Alejandro Galán sits right behind him at 1,548.4. Both have played all fifteen tournaments and both average over 103 FP per event. Arturo Coello (1,433.6) and Agustín Tapia (1,423.6), the world number ones, are a step back, and the reason is plain: they've played fourteen tournaments, not fifteen. Their averages, 102.4 and 101.7, are essentially level with the Chingotto-Galán pair. One tournament of absence is worth about 100 fantasy points at this level, and that is the whole gap.

Then comes the cliff. Leo Augsburger is fifth with 1,091.6 and Juan Lebrón sixth with 1,043.7, roughly 350 points behind the top four but comfortably clear of everyone else. They are the only two men outside the big four to clear 1,000 FP, and they've done it while costing 120 and 137 credits respectively, not 190-plus. Remember that number when we get to the value table.

Positions seven to ten are where consistency beats fireworks. Miguel Yanguas (673.4) and Franco Stupaczuk (654.3) have played every tournament and average around 44 FP. Francisco Guerrero (596.7) is ninth on the strength of fifteen appearances. And Lucas Campagnolo rounds out the ten with 594.0 from fourteen events, which is remarkable for a player priced at 87 credits. Just outside: Francisco Navarro (565.6) and Martín Di Nenno (553.6), both within one good weekend of breaking in.

💰 Top 10 by FP per Credit

Now divide by cost and the picture flips. Aimar Goñi is the most efficient man in the game, and it isn't close: 553.1 fantasy points at a price of 37.5 credits works out to 14.75 FP per credit, nearly double anyone else. He has played all fifteen tournaments, averages 36.9 FP, and costs less than a fifth of what Chingotto does while delivering more than a third of his points. Maxi Arce is second at 9.81 (471.8 FP for 48.1 credits), and Leo Augsburger is third at 9.12, the only top-five scorer who also cracks the top three for value.

Juan Ignacio De Pascual (8.96) and Enzo Jensen (8.16) complete the bargain wing. De Pascual has only played nine tournaments but costs 30.7 credits, the cheapest player anywhere near this list. Jensen, the Italian, has 414.7 FP from eleven events at 50.8 credits and a per-tournament average of 37.7, higher than Goñi's. If he plays the rest of the calendar, expect him to climb.

Here's the part that matters for your budget: the big four are not bad value. Chingotto (8.08) and Galán (8.06) sit sixth and seventh, and Lebrón (7.63), Coello (7.43) and Tapia (7.40) follow. At nearly 200 credits each, they still return around eight points for every credit spent, better than most mid-priced players. The players to avoid are in the middle: Stupaczuk gives you 3.78 FP per credit at 173 credits, and several 110-130 credit regulars return between 4 and 5. That's the expensive dead zone. The efficient lineup spends big on two or three of the top four, fills the rest with Goñi, Arce, Jensen and De Pascual, and skips the middle entirely.

🎯 Lineup takeaways