The 2026 Partnership Map: Who's Firing, Who's Fading, and What It All Means for Your OutOfTheCourt Squad

The 2026 Premier Padel season was always going to be defined by its partnerships. After a winter transfer market that tore apart legends — the Ariana Sánchez–Paula Josemaría five-year dynasty gone, Lebrón and Stupaczuk separated almost before the paint dried on their collaboration — the new pairings entered Riyadh carrying enormous expectations and varying degrees of uncertainty. What's unfolded since is one of the most compelling partnership storylines the tour has ever produced: a women's circuit caught in a genuine three-way war, a men's draw where the so-called challengers have started eating the throne, and a mid-season reshuffle among the men that dropped a bombshell on OutOfTheCourt squads everywhere. The fantasy implications are enormous — and we're going to dig into all of it.

🏆 Top

Let's start at the very top, because Arturo Coello (#1, FP: 104.0, Cost: 193) and Agustín Tapia (#1, FP: 101.8, Cost: 192.5) remain the most expensive pair on the men's board for a reason that borders on absurdity. These two have won the last two seasons with 14 and 13 titles respectively, and that 47-match winning streak is still the benchmark against which every other pair in padel measures itself. That streak was eventually ended — by Nieto and Sanz at the 2024 Finals in Barcelona, of all people — but the broader point stands: Tapia and Coello don't lose often. In 2026 they've reached 13 finals already, the most on tour, and their 8 titles lead the men's draw. At a combined cost of 385.5 credits for your OutOfTheCourt squad, they're premium assets who consistently deliver. The tactical engine here is the drive-side of Coello and Tapia's backhand — a left-right combination that generates extraordinary court coverage — and the data backs up what the eye test suggests: they are simply the deepest pair in the draw. The question for OutOfTheCourt managers isn't whether to own them. It's whether you can afford to own both.

But here's where it gets genuinely interesting, because Federico Chingotto (#3, FP: 113.4, Cost: 193.7) and Alejandro Galán (#3, FP: 106.8, Cost: 192.2) — 'Chingalán' — have been the story of the 2026 men's circuit. In what has to be considered a genuine season-long heist, they overtook Coello and Tapia at the top of the 2026 Race after winning the NewGiza P2, which was their fourth title of the season at that point. Their win-loss record of 18-2 at that juncture was not an accident. Chingotto brings that uniquely Argentine drive-side power and the kind of attacking instinct that unlocks any surface, while Galán — playing backhand at world No. 3 — is one of the most technically complete left-side players alive. The Pretoria P1, their sixth title of 2026, required enormous character: they saved a championship point against Leal and Guerrero in a deciding-set tiebreak to seal it 7-6 (9-7). Galán himself admitted afterward that Chingotto had essentially carried him through a difficult week. That mutual reliance, that genuine partnership in the truest sense, is what makes 'Chingalán' not just statistically excellent but emotionally compelling to follow. For OutOfTheCourt purposes, Chingotto at FP 113.4 is the highest fantasy point scorer in the entire men's roster and costs only 0.3 credits more than Tapia. That's extraordinary value if you believe — and the results say you should — that Chingalán has another extended run in them.

On the women's side, Gemma Triay (#1, FP: 101.9, Cost: 192.5) and Delfina Brea (#1, FP: 103.4, Cost: 192.2) are still the rulers of the women's draw, and the statistics reflect an almost mechanical efficiency that is deeply frustrating for everyone trying to beat them. They've now reached 14 finals in 2026 — the most of any women's pair — and have five titles on the season. What makes them so hard to displace is the consistency: Triay's backhand side is arguably the most reliable in women's padel, while Brea's drive-side combination of aggression and touch gives them a gear that most partnerships simply can't match. They were pushed hard in Pretoria — Claudia Fernández and Martina Calvo had them at 5-4 in the third set — but when it mattered, Delfi and Gemma locked it down. At a combined cost of 384.7 credits, they're the most expensive women's pairing on the OutOfTheCourt board, and based on their 14 finals appearances, the return justifies every credit.

Now the elephant in the room: Paula Josemaría (#5, FP: 102.8, Cost: 191.3) paired with Beatriz González (#4, FP: 90.6, Cost: 141.7) is the partnership that has genuinely threatened Brea and Triay in a way nobody else has managed. González made what was described as a bold decision — leaving Claudia Fernández after a strong 2025 to partner with Josemaría following the famous Josemaría–Ariana Sánchez split. The result has been historic. Their five consecutive titles — Miami, Newgiza, Brussels, Asunción and Buenos Aires — is something no women's pair had ever achieved in Premier Padel. Five straight titles. Against the world No. 1 pair. Every single time. The tactical logic is clear: Josemaría's attacking left-handed drive creates angles that most right-side players simply can't cover, and González at backhand has the defensive solidity and finishing to convert under pressure. The FP values here tell an interesting story: Paula sits at 102.8 and costs 191.3, a near-identical profile to Triay, but Bea at 90.6 costs only 141.7 — a full 50 credits cheaper than Delfina Brea. That cost differential is how you build a competitive OutOfTheCourt squad without mortgaging your entire budget on the top tier. The Josemaría–González pairing, on pure 2026 form, might be the best value at the elite level anywhere on the board.

There's one more partnership you cannot ignore in the men's draw heading into the final stretch: Juan Lebrón (#5, FP: 89.1, Cost: 136.7) and Leo Augsburger (#6, FP: 61.2, Cost: 119.7). The pairing was built on explosive potential — Lebrón's transition game and attacking instincts combined with Augsburger's smash power, arguably the best in the world for a player his age. They won Brussels P2 in April, beating Tapia and Coello in the final 2-6, 6-3, 6-3, which was a legitimate statement result. Their combined cost of just 256.4 credits for players ranked 5th and 6th in the world is, on paper, a significant budget unlock for OutOfTheCourt managers. But there's a mid-season catch — more on that shortly.

🆕 New

The off-season reshuffle that kicked everything off started with the biggest split in women's padel history: Ariana Sánchez and Paula Josemaría ended their five-year partnership after accumulating 44 titles and two world No. 1 seasons together. Their final match as a pair was at the Barcelona Finals, and what followed was a cascade of new alliances. Ari Sánchez (#3, FP: 102.8, Cost: 191.3) partnered with Andrea Ustero (#7, FP: 50.7, Cost: 124.8) — a left-right combination designed around Ari's experience directing play from the backhand and Ustero's aggressive drive-side attacking game. It was described at the time as an ambitious project built to perform from day one, not a development experiment. And it has delivered in flashes: they've reached at least one Major final in 2026, defeating Claudia Fernández and Martina Calvo at the Paris Major 6-2, 6-0. For OutOfTheCourt managers, the cost differential here is significant — Ustero at just 124.8 credits is among the cheapest entry points into an elite women's backline, though her FP of 50.7 reflects the reality that her role remains supporting rather than scoring.

On the men's side, Stupaczuk (#8, FP: 89.6, Cost: 173) had everyone buzzing at the pre-season Summer Pro Padel in Mar del Plata when he and Miguel Yanguas (#9, FP: 60.7, Cost: 129.9) showed up looking dangerous — and they backed it up on tour with a run to the NewGiza final, losing to Chingalán 6-4, 6-1, before a mid-season split threw everything into chaos again. Stupaczuk and Yanguas were seeded together, had built genuine momentum, and then — after a difficult first half by their standards — they split. Stupaczuk moved to partner with Jon Sanz (#10, FP: 52.1, Cost: 122.9), while Nieto and Yanguas reformed. For OutOfTheCourt squads, this matters enormously: Stupaczuk's FP of 89.6 at a cost of 173 had been offering solid value in the Stupa-Yanguas combination, but the mid-season change creates genuine uncertainty about trajectory. Managers holding Stupaczuk need to track how quickly the Stupa-Sanz chemistry develops, because right now they're an unknown quantity in the final third of the season.

💔 Splits

The split that will define the second half of the men's season is the Nieto–Sanz reunion that wasn't. Coming into 2026, Jorge Nieto (#12, FP: 59.2, Cost: 128.7) and Jon Sanz (#10, FP: 52.1, Cost: 122.9) had reformed their celebrated pairing after their famous 2024 title together — they were the pair that ended Tapia and Coello's 47-match winning streak at the Barcelona Finals. That historical context made their reunion feel like a genuine threat. But the 2026 version of Nieto–Sanz never recovered the chemistry from 2024: Sanz himself acknowledged he had not found the feeling they had before, and wasn't satisfied with the direction of their results. The mid-season split sent Nieto back to partner with Yanguas — and Sanz across to Stupaczuk. It's a messy situation from an OutOfTheCourt perspective. Nieto at 59.2 FP and 128.7 cost sits in a mid-price tier where consistency is everything, and the Nieto–Yanguas combination now has to rebuild its rhythm with the season already more than half done. Yanguas at just 60.7 FP and 129.9 cost is similarly priced — these two together might represent a stabilising force, but managers shouldn't expect instant results.

The other split worth examining in detail is the quiet dismantling of Francisco Navarro (#7, FP: 62.5, Cost: 123.3) from the Sanz partnership that existed in 2025. Navarro spent 2025 with Jon Sanz, and when that dissolved he found himself in a new combination with Momo Gonzalez (#14, FP: 44.3, Cost: 117.6) — a backhand-backhand pairing that creates some tactical awkwardness. Navarro's FP of 62.5 at cost 123.3 is reasonable value in isolation, but a same-side pairing with Momo adds positional uncertainty. Then there's Martin Di Nenno (#11, FP: 58.6, Cost: 125.3), the drive-side Argentine who has been through the partnership carousel more than most — he was with Lebrón in 2024, then separate in 2025, now landing wherever the shuffled deck dealt him. His FP of 58.6 and cost of 125.3 put him in the mid-range tier where the value only emerges with consistent deep runs, and right now his trajectory in 2026 is unclear enough that only risk-tolerant managers should be adding him.

📊 Impact

Let's talk numbers directly, because this is OutOfTheCourt and the credits matter. The single best value proposition in the entire men's board right now is the Chingotto–Galán axis. Chingotto at FP 113.4 and cost 193.7 is the highest-scoring men's player on the roster. Galán at FP 106.8 costs just 192.2. For a combined 385.9 credits, you get six 2026 titles, an 18-2 run at peak form, and a pair that has shown repeatedly it can beat Tapia and Coello when it counts. Yes, that's roughly the same cost as Coello–Tapia, but Chingotto's superior FP return tips the balance for managers who can only afford one elite men's pair. The Lebrón–Augsburger combination at a combined 256.4 credits remains the best mid-range unlock — but hold off on any knee-jerk moves until you see how the Stupa–Sanz and Nieto–Yanguas reshuffles settle. The men's draw between positions 8 and 12 is in a state of flux, and buying into uncertainty mid-season is how you lose a fantasy lead.

On the women's side, the strategic decision every OutOfTheCourt manager faces right now is whether to pay the full premium for Triay–Brea (combined 384.7) or pivot to Josemaría–González (combined 332.0) and bank the 52.7-credit saving for depth elsewhere. The form argument, purely based on 2026 titles, favors González–Josemaría's six trophies over Triay–Brea's five. But Triay–Brea lead the finals count 14 to González–Josemaría's total, meaning they're still reaching the business end of every event. Our read: if you can only afford one elite women's pair, González at 141.7 credits — fifty credits cheaper than Brea at 192.2, with a solid FP of 90.6 — is the most efficient credit deployment on the entire women's board. The Ari Sánchez–Ustero pairing adds intrigue as an alternative at the upper tier, with Ari at 102.8 FP and 191.3 cost providing near-top-tier value if their chemistry continues to build. Claudia Fernández (#6, FP: 86.0, Cost: 181.7) is another name to watch — she reached the Pretoria final with Martina Calvo as the newly formed pair ranked 4th, which signals upside at a cost that doesn't drain your budget.

💥 Key Storylines

🏆 Season Leaderboard