Germany P2 2026 Fantasy Padel: Best Picks, Best Value & Season Leaderboard

Germany P2 in Düsseldorf just closed the books on another Premier Padel weekend, and if you haven't already been stress-refreshing your OutOfTheCourt dashboard, now's the time. Nineteen tournaments into the season, the fantasy data is no longer speculative — it's a verdict. The averages are stable, the value picks have proven themselves, and the managers at the top of the global leaderboard didn't get there by guessing. Let's break down exactly what the numbers are saying and how you can put them to work.

📍 This week's example: Germany P2 2026

📊 Highest Average FP

Federico Chingotto sits at number three in the world ranking and, frankly, he might be the single most important asset in the fantasy game right now. Across 19 tournaments, he's averaging 113.4 fantasy points per event at a cost of 193.7 credits — and that average hasn't been propped up by one lucky run. That's what consistency does over a long season: it turns a strong player into an undeniable anchor. He plays on the right side with an attacking role and drive as his dominant weapon, which means he's accumulating points in every phase of a match, not just when things go perfectly. At 193.7 credits, he's not cheap, but a premium asset rarely is. The question isn't whether Chingotto is worth the money — it's how you build the other five men around him to stay inside the 1,000-credit budget.

On the women's side, Delfina Brea Senesi is doing something equally remarkable. She leads the women's fantasy rankings with an average of 103.4 FP across those same 19 tournaments, priced at 192.2 credits. Also an attacking right-side drive player, she mirrors Chingotto's profile almost perfectly — high floor, high ceiling, and a playing style that generates fantasy points relentlessly. She costs you 192.2 credits of your women's allocation, but you're essentially buying a guaranteed return week after week. Think of her the way a football fantasy manager thinks about a world-class striker: yes, she's expensive, yes she limits what you can spend elsewhere, but her floor is so high that you're absorbing risk everywhere else on the team by having her locked in.

The key strategic point about anchoring both Chingotto and Brea Senesi is the math it forces on your other picks. If you spend roughly 193–194 credits on each of them, you've used approximately 387 credits on just two players out of twelve. That leaves around 613 credits for ten players. That's tight — but it's entirely workable if you pair them with the value and budget picks we're about to get into. The premium average only justifies the cost if you're disciplined about the rest of the squad.

💰 Best Cost/Points Ratio

Maximiliano Arce might be the most underrated name in the men's game right now, at least from a fantasy perspective. Sixty-point-eight average fantasy points for just 48.1 credits. That's a ratio of 1.26 FP per credit — the best in the men's pool, and it isn't close. For context, you could fit four Arces into your squad for roughly the same cost as one Chingotto, and while you obviously wouldn't do that, the ratio tells you exactly how much production you're getting per credit spent. Arce is the kind of player who makes your budget work: he's not the headline, but he might be the reason your headline players are even affordable.

But here's where it gets interesting on the women's side. Martina Calvo Santamaria comes in at 78.5 FP for 115.5 credits — a ratio of 0.68 FP per credit. Now, 0.68 is lower than Arce's 1.26, so why is she the best women's value pick? Because context matters. She's delivering 78.5 average points at a mid-tier price point in a women's pool where that kind of output at that cost is genuinely hard to find. She's not a bargain-basement punt — she's a proper contributor who doesn't break the bank. Slotting Calvo Santamaria into your women's lineup frees up meaningful credits compared to reaching for the next tier of premium players, and those credits go straight toward anchoring Brea Senesi at the top. That's how value picks actually work: they don't just save money, they enable ambition elsewhere.

🔥 Most FP Delivered

Average points tell you about reliability. Total points delivered tell you about impact — and over a full season, the gap between a consistently good player and everyone else becomes a chasm. Federico Chingotto has delivered 2,155 total fantasy points across his 19 tournaments, a figure that reflects not just his high average but the fact that he's shown up every single week. Nineteen appearances, 113.4 per event — the multiplication is simple, but what it represents is rare: a player who gives you nothing to complain about. Germany P2 in Düsseldorf is just the latest data point in what has been a relentless season of production.

Delfina Brea Senesi has delivered 1,965 total fantasy points over the same 19 tournaments, making her the clear women's season-contribution leader. The 190-point gap between her total and Chingotto's is almost entirely explained by her slightly lower average — 103.4 vs 113.4 — rather than any difference in availability or consistency. Both players have been ever-present, which is its own form of value. In a fantasy game where injuries and tournament absences can quietly hollow out a squad, having players who appear in all 19 events is something you actively build around. When you're deciding who earns a permanent spot in your lineup versus who rotates, total contribution over a full season is the number that settles the argument.

🪙 Best Budget Pick

If you're running tight on credits after locking in your anchors, Juan Ignacio De Pascual is your best friend in the men's pool. Ranked 42nd, averaging 34.1 FP across 12 tournaments, and costing just 30.7 credits — he is, by some margin, the cheapest productive option available. Yes, 34.1 average points isn't going to win you a head-to-head on its own, but at 30.7 credits you're essentially getting a free roster slot that still contributes. An attacking right-side drive player, De Pascual's profile suggests he can put up meaningful numbers when his pairing clicks. In a 1,000-credit squad, having a 30.7-credit slot instead of a 60- or 70-credit one could be the difference between affording Chingotto and not. That's the whole point of a budget pick — it's not about him, it's about what he makes possible.

The women's budget situation is a little more complicated. Lea Godallier is listed as the best budget pick at 50.6 credits, but let's be honest about what you're getting: an average of 8.5 FP across 11 tournaments. She's ranked 49th, plays on the French tour's backhand side, and her numbers reflect a player still finding her feet at this level. She's genuinely cheap, and in a pinch she does the job of filling a roster spot without destroying your budget — but she shouldn't be your idea of a productive sixth woman. Think of Godallier as a credits-freeing placeholder while you invest heavily in Brea Senesi and Calvo Santamaria higher up the lineup. If you can pair her with De Pascual in the budget slots, you've potentially saved 120+ credits compared to mid-tier alternatives — and that's a budget upgrade elsewhere waiting to happen.

🎯 Takeaways of the Week

🏆 Season Leaderboard