October 8, 2026
Chingotto and Brea top every metric that matters — but Rotterdam just proved the value picks can flip your whole roster
Rotterdam P2 wrapped at Ahoy on Sunday and, once again, the fantasy data tells a story the scoreboard alone can't. Stupaczuk and Sanz tore up the men's draw — Galán and Chingotto fell in the quarters — and on the women's side, Brea and Triay were bounced in the semis by the Fallada–Prieto pair. Chaos is good for padel; it's even better for fantasy managers who built smart. Eighteen tournaments into the season, the numbers are clear enough to act on. Here's what they're telling you.
📍 This week's example: Rotterdam P2 2026
The average-FP leaderboard has two names at the absolute top, and they're not a surprise — but the numbers behind them deserve your full attention. Federico Chingotto sits third in the world rankings and first in our fantasy averages: 113.4 fantasy points per tournament across 18 events, at a cost of 193.7 credits. That's not luck. Chingotto and Galán have gone 64–10 on court in 2026, winning seven titles, and that relentless winning — deep runs in almost every draw — is exactly what fantasy points are built on. He's a right-side attacker (drive) who generates points from aggressive play, and his all-around (AR) tag means he contributes across multiple scoring categories, not just match wins. At 193.7 credits, he's expensive. But when a player averages 113.4 FP over 18 tournaments, you're not gambling on a hot streak — you're buying a machine.
On the women's side, Delfina Brea Senesi is the undisputed No. 1 — in the world rankings and in your fantasy squad. Her 103.4 average FP per tournament across those same 18 events, at 192.2 credits, mirrors Chingotto's story almost line for line. Brea has been ranked No. 1 for 41 of the last 52 weeks and plays with the same aggressive right-side, drive-heavy game that consistently generates fantasy scoring. Rotterdam was a semifinal exit, which will clip this week's haul — but zoom out and 103.4 per tournament is what consistency looks like. Both Chingotto and Brea are your 1,000-credit team's anchors: lock them in first, then build everyone else around what's left. Yes, they eat nearly 386 credits between them. Yes, it's worth it.
Now here's where it gets interesting. You don't win fantasy leagues by spending on two anchors and filling the rest of your roster with scraps — you win by finding the picks that punch above their price tag. Maximiliano Arce is the men's value pick of the season, full stop. Sixty point eight fantasy points for just 48.1 credits — a ratio of 1.26 FP per credit. To put that in perspective: Chingotto's ratio, elite as he is, is around 0.59 FP per credit. Arce is more than twice as efficient per credit spent. He's not going to win you a tournament outright, but in a 1,000-credit squad where every credit is sacred, slotting Arce into your men's roster frees serious budget that you can redirect to a second premium pick or shore up your women's side.
Martina Calvo Santamaria is the women's equivalent: 78.5 FP for 115.5 credits, a ratio of 0.68 FP per credit. That might not sound as jaw-dropping as Arce's number, but context matters. On the women's side, the mid-tier pricing band runs higher, so 115.5 credits for that return is genuinely efficient. Rotterdam was a reminder of her ceiling, too — she and Claudia Fernández pushed deep into the quarterfinals. If you're running both Chingotto and Brea as anchors, then slotting Arce and Calvo Santamaria as your value pair is the build that makes the budget work. You're getting nearly 140 combined FP for under 164 combined credits. That's the formula.
Average FP tells you quality; total FP delivered tells you volume. And volume wins leagues. Federico Chingotto has contributed 2,041 total fantasy points this season — 113.4 per tournament multiplied by 18 appearances. That makes him the single biggest points contributor in the entire men's game. Not just per event: in aggregate, across the whole season. His 86.5% win rate on court in 2026 is the engine behind that number. Every deep run, every semifinal, every final appearance piles on. Galán and Chingotto have faced the top seeds in 11 finals this season — that's 11 rounds of bonus-heavy fantasy scoring.
Delfina Brea Senesi has delivered 1,861 total FP across those 18 tournaments, the highest season contribution in the women's game. She and Triay have appeared in more women's finals this season than any other pair, and that consistency translates directly into cumulative fantasy output. The gap between Brea's 1,861 and whoever sits third on this list is significant — we're not talking about a marginal lead. If you've had either of these two on your roster all season, you already know. If you haven't, the leaderboard data below tells you exactly what that decision has cost.
Not every slot on your 12-player roster is a place for a 190-credit superstar. Two of your six men's slots and two of your six women's slots should be doing a different job: keeping the lights on cheaply enough that your premium picks can exist. Juan Ignacio De Pascual (#42) is built for that role on the men's side. Averaging 34.1 FP across 11 tournaments at just 30.7 credits, he's one of the cheapest productive options in the men's draw. He's a right-side, drive-heavy player with an all-around tag — same profile as the big names, just at a fraction of the cost. Eleven tournaments of consistent appearances means he's not a one-week wonder, either. At 30.7 credits, slotting De Pascual in frees up roughly 163 extra credits compared to a mid-range 194-credit pick — that's almost another premium women's player.
On the women's side, Lea Godallier (#50) presents a different kind of value proposition. Eight point five average FP across 11 tournaments at 50.6 credits is the lowest output in this week's featured group, and honesty matters: she's a genuine floor-of-the-roster pick, not a fantasy star. But she's a French backhand specialist who qualifies as a budget option when you're truly squeezed — her 50.6 credit price tag is a rounding error in a 1,000-credit budget. Pair her with Calvo Santamaria rather than anchoring your women's value slot on her alone, and you've got a women's side that balances premium (Brea, 192.2 credits), mid-value (Calvo Santamaria, 115.5) and ultra-budget (Godallier, 50.6) without blowing past 400 total credits on the women's half of the roster. That's the math that keeps your men's side fully stocked.
📌 Anchor on Chingotto (193.7cr) and Brea (192.2cr) first — 2,041 and 1,861 total FP delivered this season make them non-negotiables if your budget allows
💰 Stack Arce (48.1cr, 1.26 FP/cr) and Calvo Santamaria (115.5cr, 0.68 FP/cr) together — nearly 140 combined FP for under 164 combined credits is the value double that makes premium anchors possible
🎯 Use De Pascual (30.7cr) as your men's floor pick — the 163+ credits he saves versus a mid-tier alternative is budget you reinvest in a second elite woman or a high-upside wildcard
| # | Team | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | FJorgensenTeam | 12599.6 |
| 2 | DavidCereCat | 12149 |
| 3 | GusTeam | 12058.8 |
| 4 | Padelcilu | 11714.7 |
| 5 | sebsx4 | 11657.1 |
The Rotterdam dust has settled. Build your squad now on OutOfTheCourt — lock in your anchors before the next draw drops.
Download on Android Download on iOS