OutOfTheCourt Fantasy Stats: London P1 Wrap-Up — Best Averages, Top Value Picks & Season Leaderboard

The curtain has fallen on London P1 2026 — Premier Padel's historic first stop on British soil, played to sold-out crowds at Olympia — and while Coello & Tapia claimed the men's trophy and 18-year-old Martina Calvo Santamaria made history in the women's, the real story for OutOfTheCourt managers is what the season's fantasy numbers now look like across 15 tournaments of data. We've got average-FP kings and queens, jaw-dropping value picks, and a budget hero so cheap he practically pays you back. Let's get into it.

📍 This week's example: London P1 2026

📊 Highest Average FP

Fifteen tournaments in and Federico Chingotto is the most reliable fantasy asset on the men's side — full stop. A 113.4 average FP across every single event he's entered, priced at 193.7 credits, and ranked world No. 3 on the real-world tour to boot. That average isn't built on one hot streak and a few flukes; it's the product of what Chingotto does every single week — play deep into draws, reach finals, and grind out points with the kind of defensive precision and rally endurance that fantasy systems love to reward. He and Galán went all the way to the men's final at Olympia before Coello & Tapia edged them in three sets, which means even in defeat, Chingotto was delivering. That's the anchor player blueprint right there.

On the women's side, Delfina Brea Senesi sits at world No. 1 for good reason, and her fantasy numbers mirror that dominance. A 103.4 average FP across 15 tournaments, at 192.2 credits, puts her fractionally cheaper than Chingotto with only marginally lower output — genuinely elite parity. Brea and Triay went all the way to the London women's final before losing to Fernández and Calvo, continuing a pattern of deep runs that fantasy managers can virtually bank on. Her aggressive, attacking right-side game generates the kind of high-action, point-rich performances that translate beautifully into fantasy returns. At 192.2 credits she isn't cheap, but the 1,000-credit budget math makes sense: lock in Brea and Chingotto as your two premium anchors, and you've got a combined average of 216.8 FP per tournament flowing into your score — then build the rest of your 10-player squad around them with value and budget picks.

The key question when paying top dollar is always this: does the floor hold up, or do you get week-on-week variance that kills your ranking? With both Chingotto and Brea spread across 15 tournaments, the sample size answers that emphatically. These aren't boom-or-bust gambles. They're the closest thing fantasy padel has to a guaranteed return, and in a 1,000-credit budget game, predictability at the top of your roster is worth every credit you spend.

💰 Best Cost/Points Ratio

Here's where it gets interesting. Not everyone has the luxury of spending 193.7 on Chingotto and 192.2 on Brea and still fielding a competitive 12-player squad. So who do you turn to when credits are tight on the men's side? Maximiliano Arce. Sixty-point-eight fantasy points for just 48.1 credits — a ratio of 1.26 FP per credit that no other man on the tour comes close to matching. That's not a typo. While the premium names are costing you anywhere from 150 to 200 credits, Arce is slipping under the radar and producing returns that, on a per-credit basis, actually beat the guys whose names you see on every other team. He frees up an enormous chunk of your budget to spend on mid-tier depth — and in a 12-player format, depth wins leagues.

The women's equivalent is Martina Calvo Santamaria at 115.5 credits for 78.5 FP — a ratio of 0.68 FP per credit. Now, in pure ratio terms she trails Arce, but context is everything here: Calvo just became the youngest player ever to win a Premier Padel title at London P1, doing it at 18 years, one month and four days. The real-world form is spiking in exactly the right direction. At 115.5 credits she sits comfortably in the mid-range, and what you're getting is a player whose fantasy output should trend upward from here — buying low on a rising star rather than paying premium for a plateaued one. For managers still hunting credits to slot in a Chingotto or a Brea, Calvo is the women's pick that makes that math work. She costs 76 credits fewer than Brea and just delivered a title in front of 20,000 fans in London. The value conversation starts and ends there.

🔥 Most FP Delivered

Season contribution is a different lens entirely — it rewards the players who not only score well per tournament but actually show up to all of them. And nobody has shown up more consistently, or more productively, than Federico Chingotto. Multiply that 113.4 average across all 15 tournaments played and you get 1,701 total fantasy points delivered to managers who had the conviction to pick him and keep him. That's not just the best number on the men's board — it's a monument to consistency. Chingotto has been in finals, semis, and deep rounds week after week with Galán, and that relentless competitive presence is the engine behind 1,701 cumulative FP. If your season ranking is suffering, the first question to ask yourself is: did you hold Chingotto from tournament one?

Delfina Brea Senesi isn't far behind, with 1,551 total FP across her 15 appearances — the highest season contribution by any woman in the game. That figure captures not just her ceiling but her floor: Brea doesn't have off-weeks the way most players do. She and Triay have been in or around finals from Riyadh to London, and that relentless consistency compounds over a long season in a way that blows flashier, less reliable picks out of the water. Managers who anchored their women's squad around Brea from the start didn't just get a great individual pick — they built a stable, high-scoring foundation that freed them to take calculated risks elsewhere. That's the real lesson of the season-contribution leaderboard.

🪙 Best Budget Pick

Now for the fun part — finding the players who punch so far above their price tag that you almost feel guilty picking them. On the men's side, Juan Ignacio De Pascual is sitting at #50 in the rankings and costs just 30.7 credits, averaging 34.1 FP across 9 tournaments. Think about what 30.7 credits means in a 1,000-credit budget: it's roughly the price of a tournament warm-up ball. But 34.1 FP per event from a player at that price point? That's extraordinary efficiency from the cheap end of the roster. De Pascual won't carry your team, but he doesn't need to — he fills the sixth male slot for almost nothing and frees up credits that can go straight toward a Chingotto or a mid-tier differential. In a squad-building game, the 30.7-credit player who delivers 34.1 FP is just as important as the 193.7-credit star. He's the budget cornerstone that makes the whole structure work.

On the women's side, Patricia Martinez Fortun at 49.4 credits averages 10.3 FP across her 4 tournaments — and yes, the raw number is modest, but the price-to-access ratio at the bottom of a 1,000-credit women's budget is the point. Patricia costs 49.4 credits and plays at #50 on tour, which means she's funneling credits upward toward the players who move the needle: your Brea, your Calvo. If you think of your 12-player squad as a financial portfolio, the Patricias and De Pascuals of the game are the low-yield, ultra-safe bonds that let you take higher positions in premium assets without blowing your cap. With only 1,000 credits to split across six men and six women, getting your budget picks right isn't an afterthought — it's half the battle.

🎯 Takeaways of the Week

🏆 Season Leaderboard