July 5, 2026
Tapia/Coello claim men's crown in thriller, but women's upset steals the show with historic fantasy scores
The Bordeaux P2 2026 final delivered the dramatic finale fantasy padel deserved. Agustin Tapia and Arturo Coello battled back from a set down to edge Alejandro Galan and Federico Chingotto 5-7 7-6(4) 6-2, securing the men's title with a combined 93.2 FP. But the women's draw belonged entirely to Tamara Icardo Alcorisa and Claudia Jensen, who dismantled Gemma Triay Pons and Delfina Brea Senesi 6-3 1-6 1-6 in a stunning reversal, with Jensen posting a tournament-high 102.8 FP.
The men's final was a three-set marathon that had fantasy managers on the edge of their seats. Tapia and Coello were forced to dig deep after losing the opening set 5-7, but their resilience paid dividends—they stormed through a dramatic tiebreak to level at one set each, then dominated the decider 6-2. The partnership combined for an impressive 46.6 FP each, demonstrating the kind of consistent performance required to win at P2 level. For Galan and Chingotto, a disappointing 8.9 FP apiece suggests their usual dominance was neutralized by their opponents' superior court positioning and execution.
This victory marks another statement from the Tapia/Coello combination. Three sets of pure padel chess, with momentum swings that could have tipped either way. The tiebreak at 7-6(4) was the turning point—a technical masterclass that broke Galan's resistance and set up the final-set blitz. Fantasy managers who backed Tapia and Coello were handsomely rewarded.
| # | Player | FP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agustin Tapia | 46.6 |
| 2 | Arturo Coello | 46.6 |
| 3 | Alejandro Galan | 8.9 |
| 4 | Federico Chingotto | 8.9 |
If the men's final was a thriller, the women's encounter was an outright upset special. Tamara Icardo Alcorisa and Claudia Jensen delivered an absolute fantasy clinic, combining for a staggering 201.2 FP—more than double their opponents' combined total. Jensen's 102.8 FP was the round's top individual score, while Icardo's 98.4 FP cemented this as a dominant performance. The scoreline—6-3 1-6 1-6—tells the story of a team that broke through early, then systematically dismantled the defending favorites.
Gemma Triay Pons and Delfina Brea Senesi were left searching for answers. Both players posted negative FP (Triay: -10.8, Brea: -11.4), an unexpectedly poor showing from a pairing with such pedigree. Icardo and Jensen's aggressive net play and precise finishing exposed weaknesses in their opponents' defensive positioning. This wasn't just a win—it was a statement that the women's padel hierarchy has shifted.
| # | Player | FP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claudia Jensen | 102.8 |
| 2 | Tamara Icardo Alcorisa | 98.4 |
| 3 | Gemma Triay Pons | -10.8 |
| 4 | Delfina Brea Senesi | -11.4 |
The fantasy splits in Bordeaux were nothing short of dramatic. While the men's final stayed relatively competitive in FP terms (Tapia/Coello's 93.2 vs Galan/Chingotto's 17.8), the women's match was a complete blowout in points economy. Jensen and Icardo's 201.2 combined FP versus Triay and Brea's -22.2 represents one of the tournament's most extreme fantasy differentials. This suggests that fantasy accuracy in women's padel heavily rewards picking the right momentum, not just the highest-seeded pairings.
Filipe's 763.6 points secured tournament victory, narrowly edging NM (692.1) and Jakteam (635.7). The fantasy leaderboard's competitive clustering suggests most managers made similar safe bets on seeding, but Filipe likely hit on the Icardo/Jensen upset pick that separated them from the field. Season-long, FJorgensenTeam continues to dominate with 8467.9, but Bordeaux's results suggest the chase is tightening.
🏆 Tapia/Coello's resilience: Down a set, they battled back to claim P2 gold with clinical third-set execution
⚡ Jensen's historic performance: 102.8 FP marked the round's highest individual score—pure fantasy gold
🔄 The upset that changed everything: Icardo/Jensen's shocking demolition of Triay/Brea rewrote the women's narrative
📊 Fantasy volatility: A 224-point swing between the women's finalists proved once again: never count out the underdogs
| # | Team | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Filipe | 763.6 |
| 2 | NM | 692.1 |
| 3 | Jakteam | 635.7 |
| 4 | Harry Potter prados | 611 |
| 5 | DoblePared | 603.3 |
Bordeaux proved that three-set finals are where fantasy fortunes are made. Were you one of the managers who backed Icardo/Jensen? Share your bold calls in the OutOfTheCourt community—and start building your lineup for the next P2 event. The season's hierarchy just shifted. Who's your next breakout pick?